Crown Disciplined for Ignoring Canadian's Language Rights
发布人:天津翻译|天津翻译公司|翻译公司|乐译通翻译 发布日期:2015-05-30 浏览次数:1843次 返回上一页
Ontario Court of Appeal Justice Paul
Rouleau has ordered the federal Crown to cover the costs of a prolonged
preliminary hearing for a defendant in a cocaine trafficking trial because of
various language rights violations. Christian Munkonda was one of eight people
charged in 2010 with offenses related to allegations of cocaine trafficking.
Six of the accused chose to be tried in English. Munkonda and another
defendant, who was eventually discharged, chose to have their preliminary
hearing in French. The Criminal Code requires that a judge must order a
proceeding to be held in both of Canada's official languages under certain
conditions, such as when there are two or more accused who speak either English
or French. The code also stipulates the provision of a bilingual judge and
prosecutor and that all court documents need to be in both official languages,
including transcripts at the preliminary hearing. Rouleau determined the
prosecution did not respect the appellant's language rights, and the treatment
it provided to the accused who exercised their right to have their preliminary
hearing held in English was superior to the treatment it afforded to the accused
who chose French. Among the examples of ignored bilingual mandates the Court of
Appeal cited was the filing of more than 1,000 conversations in four different
languages into the court record, but only in English. "The original
version of the texts of conversations in French was not included in the
transcripts," Rouleau notes. Moreover, two of the three federal
prosecutors were unilingual, as was the court reporter transcribing the
testimony. "In conceptual terms, a bilingual trial or preliminary inquiry is
a merger of a proceeding in French and a proceeding in English," Rouleau
explains. "To the extent possible and provided that it is reasonable, the
language rights of each of the accused must be respected." Jean Richer,
who represents Munkonda, says the ruling is very clear about the requirement to
respect the statutory language rights of defendants. "The court is sending
a message. Stop ignoring these sections. They are mandatory," says Richer,
who adds that they are not "ideals" but provisions that must be
followed.
From "Judge Orders Crown to Pay Costs
Over Language Rights Violations"
Canadian Lawyer (Canada) (05/06/15) Kari,
Shannon